Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-18 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-05-18 Senate Journal Page 1545 SB 89 Senator Ben Stevens brought up the concur message read May 17 and held on the Secretary's desk. (page 1500) Senator Ben Stevens moved that the Senate concur in the House amendments to CS FOR SENATE BILL NO 89(JUD) am "An Act amending the Regulation of Lobbying Act and the definition of 'lobbyist' as it applies in the act setting standards of conduct for legislators and legislative employees; and amending the Regulation of Lobbying Act and the legislative standards of conduct to allow a lobbyist to give and a person covered by legislative standards of conduct to accept tickets to a charity event during a legislative session," thus adopting HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 89(RLS) am H "An Act amending the Regulation of Lobbying Act and the definition of 'lobbyist' as it applies in the act setting standards of conduct for legislators and legislative employees; and amending the Regulation of Lobbying Act and the legislative standards of conduct to allow a lobbyist to give and a person covered by legislative standards of conduct to accept tickets to a charity event during a legislative session" and recommended the body vote no. The question being: "Shall the Senate concur in the House amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2003-05-18 Senate Journal Page 1546 HCS CSSB 89(RLS) am H Shall the Senate Concur in the House amendments to CSSB 89(JUD)? YEAS: 0 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 4 Nays: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Ellis, French, Green, Ogan, Olson, Seekins, Stevens B, Stevens G, Taylor, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Excused: Davis Absent: Elton, Guess, Hoffman, Lincoln and so, the Senate failed to concur. The Secretary was requested to notify the House of the Senate's action and request the House to recede from its amendments.